www.charlescrawford.biz     mail@charlescrawford.biz
Charles Crawford
Search charlescrawford.biz
Google


charlescrawford.biz
www
Blog categories

Shot To Pieces

31st March 2009

You are no doubt wondering what a condemned man might look like after being tied to a stake then shot at by a few hundred people with machine guns.

The answer?

Not much left except a dark red bloody splodge and a strong smell of singed meat.

With that thought in mind, read Polly Toynbee's piece asserting that the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith is a victim of the new wave of puritanism. Thus:

But here's the wake-up call. MPs have been caught napping by the new wave of puritanism...

Those who abuse, belittle and encourage popular contempt for MPs should consider that we need more good people in politics. Observing the excruciating public humiliation of the home secretary's husband for watching a couple of porn movies, with their children cringing indoors, how many potentially good future politicians decided they would rather not invite the world to root through their private life after all?

So far so trite.

Then scroll through the comments, as the angry machine guns start blazing.

I as a public servant for many years never cheated on a single penny, and would have been hauled before a disciplinary tribunal had I done so. I was expected to follow the rules and respect the spirit of the rules.

Quite right too.

Whereas far too many in the current British political leadership - MInisters and MPs and MEPs alike - seem to think that the whole point of the rules is to squeeze as much as they possible can for themselves from the public purse, skulking behind all available formalities and technicalities when they are caught out.

Had I been hauled before a disciplinary hearing for playing fast and loose with my entertainment claim, they would have cited that action as a sign of their own lofty leadership in defending Public Money.

The sheer shamelessness of it is exceeded only by the exhausting hypocrisy.

Bring on the General Election.

As for Guardian columnists. You have had your chance - and been found wanting.


Older comments:
1st April 2009
Robbie

The saddest (funniest?) thing about the whole affair is that this is a mess of their own making.

The complex expenses system came about purely because MPs were too craven to increase their salaries, fearing public backlash.

So the legitimate £100k they receive for employing staff becomes conflated with the less-legitimate £23k they voted themselves to pay for accommodation and personal expenses. The legitimate amount for covering travel to and from London is conflated with the less legitimate allowance for any car journey they take anywhere at any time.

MPs desrve to be paid well, and they are - £65k is 3 x the median salary of the UK. But most of them would struggle to earn more than that elsewhere, especially those on the Labour and Lib Dem benches, stuffed as it is with teachers, union officials, and local government administrators.

 

The solution is simple. Reintroduce the property-owning qualification.

 

Joke.

 

But really - surely we should reduce their numbers to a sensible level. 150,000 voters per MP, say, but reflect the increased workload by increasing the staffing allowance to allow an appropriate number of researchers and case workers to be employed.

And by doing so, we can afford to pay the tribunes of the people to a level that reflects their importance - in my view, approx £100k a year. And bin all non-travel and non-staffing expenses.

 

Similar salary to a senior civil servant or HM Ambassador, no?

  Home  |  Mediator  |  Speaker  |  Speechwriter  |  About  |  FAQs  |  Contact  |  Well-Armed Red Riding Hood  |  Amazon Space  |  Terms and Conditions  |  About RSS  |  Writing  |  Websites  |  badger  
For hire

Engage Charles Crawford as

 

website design by oxford web