www.charlescrawford.biz     mail@charlescrawford.biz
Charles Crawford
Search charlescrawford.biz
Google


charlescrawford.biz
www
Blog categories

Slippery Slopes: Honduras

30th June 2009

I have written previously about the Slippery Slope metaphor:

The metaphor itself is so striking that it leads to confusion, giving a sense of momentum and inexorability which are not necessarily there.

Still, it captures the idea of one thing leading to another with no real way of staying Stop.

So, what if you are a country who sees its President scheming to extend his power and using illegal or at least legally dubious tricks to achieve that, such as trying to run an illicit referendum and shipping in ballot papers from another country known for playing fast and loose with democracy?

When do you stop him? And how?

What if he ignores court rulings and presses on anyway, hoping to use the power of the state machinery improperly to get his way?

Here's a plan. Just bundle him out of his office in disgrace.

The struggle against chavismo has never been about left-right politics. It is about defending the independence of institutions that keep presidents from becoming dictators. This crisis clearly delineates the problem.

If there is one thing we can be sure of in our weary world, it is that it is safe to want an outcome which is the most unlike the one clamoured for by Chavez/Castro, as alas supported absurdly by President Obama.

Stick with it, Honduras


Older comments:
30th June 2009
Ivor
Indeed, how better to defend democracy than having the army depose an elected president before the end of his mandate. This isn't even a convincing take on neo-conservative foreign policy, it's just moronic. The reason Obama opposes the coup is because it's legally and morally wrong - do try to keep up.
30th June 2009
Charles Crawford
Nicely patronising. But is there not a pretty strong argument that it is the President who has acted unlawfully and then moved to impose his unlawfulness in various ways, a view taken by the Honduras courts themselves as reported by eg the BBC? What is meant to happen then, lawfully and/or morally? President Obama's zeal in pronouncing on this zany case just looks strange to me, as compared to his relative reticence on Iran where developments defy any reasonable standard of democracy, law and morality

  Home  |  Mediator  |  Speaker  |  Speechwriter  |  About  |  FAQs  |  Contact  |  Well-Armed Red Riding Hood  |  Amazon Space  |  Terms and Conditions  |  About RSS  |  Writing  |  Websites  |  badger  
For hire

Engage Charles Crawford as

 

website design by oxford web